Classical Measurement Error in Quadratic Models

Applied economists are often interested in models where a covariate enters in quadratic form. For instance, the Kuznets curve and Environmental Kuznets curve posit inverted-U relationships between inequality and pollution, respectively, and income. The Mincer wage equation includes a quadratic for age or experience. Many other theoretical models give rise to non-linear effects of a covariate on outcomes.

 How classical measurement error impacts the estimates is not given a lot of thought. But ... it should be.

 Suppose one estimates a quadratic model

 y = a + b1*x + b2*x^2 + e

 that satisfies all the assumptions of the CLRM except x suffers from classical measurement error. Griliches & Ringstad (1970) show that (under normality) the OLS estimates of b1 and b2 both suffer from attenuation bias. However, the bias of b2 is more severe; the plim for b2 is b2 times the squared reliability ratio. Since the reliability ratio (the ratio of the variance of the true x to the variance of the observed x) lies strictly in the unit interval, the squared reliability ratio is (much) smaller than the reliability ratio.

 Interestingly, the greater bias on b2 makes the estimated turning point suffer from expansion bias (biased away from zero in absolute value)! Again, this matters, as we often care about the turning point. When does pollution begin to fall with income? When do wages turn down with age?


References:
Zvi Griliches and Vidar Ringstad (1970), "Error-in-the-Variables Bias in Nonlinear Contexts," Econometrica, 38(2), 368-70

Popular posts from this blog

The Great Divide

Image
I applaud the fact that the American Economic Association, the European Economic Association, the Econometric Society, and the Royal Economic Society have established an ad-hoc joint committee tasked with proposing ways to improve the publication process in economics. I encourage everyone to fill out the survey  (limited to members of the AEA, EEA, ES, and RES, however) even though I am quite cynical about what may come of it. Although only tangentially related, I decided to write a post about a topic that vexes me (and others to whom I have spoken, but I will leave it to them to out themselves) at the intersection of the Venn diagram containing publishing (editing and refereeing), teaching, and econometrics.   What lies at this intersection is the great divide between theoretical and applied econometrics, both in the classroom and in the wild.  As I have progressed in my career, I have enjoyed writing more econometrics papers and fewer economics papers per se . However, when
Read more

There is Exogeneity, and Then There is Strict Exogeneity

Image
Panel data has become quite abundant. As a result, fixed effects models have become prevalent in applied research. But, this week I handled a paper at one of the journals for which I am on the editorial board and was reminded of a mistake that I have seen all too frequently over the years. Most researchers are probably aware of the issue I am highlighting, but indulge me. In a cross-sectional regression model, we have y_i = a + b*x_i + e_i OLS is unbiased if x is exogenous , which requires that Cov(x_i,e_i) = 0. In other words, the covariates need to be uncorrelated with the error term from the same time period. In contrast, in a panel regression model with individual effects, we have y_it = a_i + b*x_it + e_it If we wish to allow for the possibility that Cov(a_i,x_it) differs from zero, then a_i is a "fixed" effect instead of a "random" effect. To understand what we need to assume to obtain unbiased estimates of b, we need to understand how the model i
Read more

Black Magic

Image
The world is a very different place from when I started this blog. The pandemic is over ... but I'm not sure we are in a better place. Different, not necessarily better. This brave new world has made it hard for me to find the time and mental energy to continue this blog. Moreover, with the changes at #EconTwitter ( X ) , no one may read this anyway. Nonetheless, I move forward and we shall see if this post (and any future posts) provide utility to anyone beyond myself.  So, I have spent some time thus far this summer revising my lecture notes (available here  ... although it is still in progress for some). I still stand firm in my belief that all empirical researchers ought to teach econometrics (if for no other reason as a constant reminder that there is more to the field than diff-in-diff). As I did so, I added two new extensions to my discussion of -- what else -- measurement error. But, this post is not about measurement error per se. Really. No, I mean it. Instead, it is abou
Read more